For example, in Chinese history, in Tang Dynasty, the second Emperor is Emperor Taizong of Tang, but actually, he was not the crown prince, his brother was the crown prince, and his brother and he had the different opinions of the country they could not agree with each other. So in 626, at the Xuanwu Gate of the palace, he killed his brother and became the crown prince and next year he became the emperor. Even though he killed his brother, he really made a contribution to the country. Durning his ruling ,country became more and more powerful and the people really respected him. But if he didn't kill his brother and his killed him at the Xuanwu Gate, what will happened? I think maybe the country would had a different situation. Because his brother will be a emperor and he had the different political opinions. I can not explain who is right or who is wrong. Because the truth is Emperor Gaozong won, so from the history, we can understood that he is a good emperor. And his brother's opinions became the wrong. But if his brother won, maybe Emperor Gaozong's opinions will became the wrong and everything would be changed.
So, from the history, if you imagine that the loser become the winner and the winner became the loser, is really funny but some times it is difficult to judge who is right or who is wrong, because we can not understand the really background for that time.
No comments:
Post a Comment